Summary of discussion on ST cooling issues March 12, 2004 Frank Lehner, Helge Voss Yesterday we had a meeting with the people from the CERN-ST/CV cooling division, who are going to design the cooling infrastructure for IT and TT. The baseline requirements are C6F14 as cooling liquid, -15 C coolant temperature at the detector input and a flow of maximum 3000l/h for each IT and TT. (designed for a maximum reasonable Beetle power consumption of 0.86W (see Sven's transparancies) The issues discussed were the following: 1) Temperature regulation/variation: We decided on a maxium temperature variation of the cooling liquid of +- 0.5C and a possible range of working points of -15 C to +15 C. THis translates into a chiller capable of reaching -20C and we'ld like to understand the cost implications of a chiller being able to provide -30C... for additional safty) 2) Pumps: In order to reduce costs, the second redundant pump in each cooling cirquit should be dropped. One spare pump for TT and IT together however will be available. (typical lifetime of the pumps are many years) 3) Transfer lines: In the current design 3 transfer lines (from control / counting room) are foreseen for the IT and one for the TT. This will be a matter of debate in order to reduce cost at the next meeting, when the alternative design of only ONE transfer line for IT as well as for TT are evalutated. 4) Manifolds/patch panel In addition we asked them to provide also the manifold/valves/flowmeters close to the detector stations (12 coolig lines for IT and 6 for TT) and to include them in their control system. (IT wouldn't make sense to start designing an additional control system if we would split the responsibilities for the cooling up to close to the detector and "near" the detector) 5) One combined Chiller: In the next ST-meeting we should also discuss the possibility of using one chiller only for IT and TT togehter. The possible cost savings will be evaluated by the ST-group. In the next meeting set for the 7th April, a clearer cost brakedown should be avilable on which basis we then need to decide on the final design which needs to be finished accoring to the current schedule by end of May in order to start the invitation for tender in June.